AMITABH KUMAR TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
/7416/2025 · 2025-08-06
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155475 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155475 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45658-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7416 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amitabh Kumar Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Dept. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Mishra,Priyanshu Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard Mr. Alok Mishra, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Monika Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Namit Sharma, learned Counsel for the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The grievance in the writ petition is that the opposite party No.5 has two pet dogs which have not been registered with the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow but the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow is not taking any action under the Government Order dated
21.02.2023. Let the petitioner approach the Municipal Commissioner, Lucknow, who shall get an inquiry conducted, ascertain the correct facts after hearing the opposite party No.5, thereafter, if he finds that any action is required and obligated by the officials of the Nagar Nigam, Lucknow as per law then needful shall be done at the earliest. This exercise shall be completed within three weeks after receipt of a certified copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.)
Order Date :- 6.8.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench