RIYA GUPTA ALIAS RIYA KUMARI GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5311/2025 · 2025-07-02
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15547 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15547 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:17598] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5311 of 2025
------ Riya Gupta @ Riya Kumari Gupta, aged about- 19 years, d/o- Prahlad Gupta @ Prahalad Kumar Gupta, R/o- Katras Main Market, P.O. and P.S.- Katras, Dist- Dhanbad, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated-02-07-2025 Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dhanbad (Cyber Crime) P.S. Case No.31 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 111(2), 111(3), 111(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338 of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 66C/66D/67/67A of I.T. Act and Section 42(3)(e) of the Telecommunications Act, 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cyber crime. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that only because two mobile phones along with two SIM Cards were recovered from the possession of the petitioner, he has been implicated in this case. It is then submitted that there is no money trail involved in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.04.2025 as is evident from para-13 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Dhanbad in connection with Dhanbad (Cyber Crime) P.S. Case No.31 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Saroj/