Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155462 (ALL)

VIVEK KUMAR PANDEY AND ANOTHER v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL), AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND 10 OTHERS

/4627/2025 · 2025-08-06

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45807 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4627 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Pandey And Another Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi,Padum Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, District Ayodhya to decide the Revision No.670 of 2025, titled "Usha Devi and others vs. Ram Sanvari and others" filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 along with stay application filed therewith expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1- Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya considers and decides the aforesaid revision in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1- Additional Commissioner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide the application for interim relief filed in Revision No.670 of 2025, titled "Usha Devi and others vs. Ram Sanvari and others" filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 along with stay application expeditiously, say within a period of two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. [Alok Mathur,J.] Order Date :- 6.8.2025 KR Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench