ANKUR MEHROTRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/7503/2025 · 2025-08-05
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155427 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155427 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45481 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7503 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ankur Mehrotra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Katyayan Mishra, Mahendra Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and Sri Madhusudan Srivastava who appears for the respondent no.2. 2. The parties i.e. the petitioner as well as the respondent no.2 are present in person. 3. On the basis of the allegations levelled in the writ petition, an effort was made to settle the disputes amongst themselves. Both the parties i.e. petitioner and the respondent no.2, showing maturity have decided to amicably settle their issues. 4. The petitioner and the respondent no.2, were married and subsequently divorced. Both of them are blessed with two children namely, the daughter Ms. Kaushikee aged about sixteen years and a son named Master Rajveer, aged about eight years. 5. It is stated that Ms. Kaushikee aged about sixteen years is at present staying with the opposite party no.2. Similarly, the son is also staying with the opposite party no.2. 6. Considering the educational needs of Ms. Kaushikee, the parties have agreed that Ms. Kaushikee shall settle with the petitioner who is staying at Bengluru to which, the respondent no.2 has no objection. Similarly, the son of the parties namely Master Rajveer will stay with the respondent no.2, who is presently staying with her at Lucknow. 7. It is agreed amongst the parties that the respondent no.2 will be allowed visiting rights to meet Ms. Kaushikee as and when she desires. Similarly the petitioner would also have the visiting right to meet Master Rajveer as and when he desires. Both the parties shall ensure the welfare of the two children in terms of the agreement and the conditions as recorded above. Ms. Kaushikee would be permitted to go with the petitioner to Bengluru as and when she desires for taking her education. 8. If any clarification is needed in the order passed herein
above, the petitioner as well as the respondent no.2 will be at liberty to file the application for modification of the order, in case they so desires. 9. Needless to say that Ms. Kaushikee would be entitled to come back to the respondent no.2 if she so desires without any further legal formalities.
It is also to be agreed that the petitioner would not change his mobile number i.e. 73557 87143 in future and in case he changes the same, he would inform the opposite party no.2 about the same. 10. The writ petition stands disposed off in terms of the settlement agreed in between the parties as recorded above. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 VNP/- [Pankaj Bhatia, J.] Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench