Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155396 (ALL)

SAKSHI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/6945/2025 · 2025-08-01

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44729-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6945 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sakshi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned A.G.A. who appears on behalf of the State/Respondents and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners with following main prayers:- "i. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing all the Respondents to not disturb the happy and peaceful life of the Petitioners. ii. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Opposite Party No. 2 to 4 not harass the Petitioners who are deeply in love with each other of their own free will and also get married the Petitioner No. 2 attains legal age of majority; iii. Issue a Writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the Respondent No. 1 and 2 to provide safety and security for the life of the Petitioners from the Respondent No. 3. iv. In alternate, this Hon'ble court may be please to issue direction passed by Hon'ble Apex court in Lata Singh vs State of U.P. 2006. Cr.L.J.3312." 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and age proof that is High School Certificate-cum-Marks Sheet and Aadhar Card of the petitioners have been filed as Annexure No.2 to the petition. They have got married and a copy of the marriage certificate has been filed as Annexure no.1 to the petition. They are being threatened by their family members and therefore, they have approached this Court praying for a Mandamus to be issued to the opposite parties not to harass the petitioners. 4. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of written instructions, states that there is no application filed by the petitioners in the police station concerned for protection. There is no F.I.R. lodged by any person against the petitioners. There is no attempt to harass the petitioners in any manner. The said instructions are taken on record. 5. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioners that in case they are threatened by their family members they may file an application under Section 154(1) or Section 154 (3) of the Cr.P.C. [Now Section 173 of the BNSS] before the Police Station/Superintendent of Police concerned, or to move an application under Section 156 (3) of the Cr.P.C. [Now Section 175 of the BNSS] before the concerned Magistrate and even filed a compliant case under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. [Now 223 of the BNSS] before the Authorities concerned. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench