ARJUN AND 2 OTHERS v. COMMISSIONER, LUCKNOW DIVISION, LKO. AND OTHERS
A227/4614/2025 · 2025-08-01
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155385 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155385 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44857 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4614 of 2025 Petitioner :- Arjun And 2 Others Respondent :- Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Vikram,Brijendra Mohan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel for the State respondents and Sri Mohan Singh for the Gram Panchayat.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution has been filed with following prayer:-
"Direct the opposite party no.1 i.e. Commissioner Lucknow Division Lucknow, to decide the interim relief application dated 23.12.2024, in computerized Case No.C202410000005365 titled as Arjun and others VS. State of U.P. and others under Section 207 of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously within reasonable time in the interest of justice."
3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in the appeal preferred by the petitioner respondents have appears but till date no detailed objection has been filed by them nor interim
order has been passed on the application for interim relief while on the other hand interference is being caused by the respondents on the disputed property for which there is requirement for expeditious disposal of the interim relief application. He further submits that the respondents have been served.
4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer.
5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within six weeks from the date service has been effected on the respondents, in case there is no legal
impediment.
6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter.
7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.1 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 1.8.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench