Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45525 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6281 of 2025 Applicant :- Munna Lal Alias Kurre Thru. His Father I.E. Saalik Ram Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Faizal Hashmi,Zoheb Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Tauseef Ali Ansari Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Short counter affidavit along with vakalatnama filed by Tauseef Ali Ansari, learned counsel on behalf of the opposite party nos. 2 to 4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Tauseef Ali Ansari, learned counsel for opposite party nos.2 to 4, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the impugned charge sheet dated 28.10.2023, summoning order dated 8.4.2025 as well as entire proceeding of the Case No.726 of 2025 (State of U.P. Vs. Munna Lal @ Kurre) arising out of Case Crime No.454 of 2023, under Sections 308, 323, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C. P.S. Purakalandar, District Ayodhya, pending before the court of Juvenile Justice Board, Ayodhya/Faizabad. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the instant case. He next added that under some misunderstanding, the instant F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicant and thereafter, the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise deed has been reduced in writing on 13.7.2025, which has been annexed as annexure no.8 to the instant application. He next added that now there is no grievance in between the parties with each other and the criminal proceedings against the applicant are the futile exercise as there is no fate of trial and that is amount to harassment of the applicant and thus, the criminal proceedings against the applicant may be quashed. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicant and submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably through a compromise deed and there is no further grievance of the opposite parties against the present applicant and the criminal proceedings against the applicant may be dropped. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Now whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. For a period of one month, the proceedings initiated in pursuance of the Case No.726 of 2025 arising out of Case Crime No.454 of 2023, under Sections 308, 323, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C. P.S. Purakalandar, District Ayodhya, pending before the court of Juvenile Justice Board, Ayodhya/Faizabad, shall remain stayed so far as it relates to the applicant. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicant, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Ram Murti Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench