ZULFIQAR ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE SECY. DEPTT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/9091/2025 · 2025-08-13
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155361 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:47634 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9091 of 2025 Petitioner :- Zulfiqar Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dharmendra Kumar Dixit Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no. 1 and Shri Asit Kumar Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Shri Dharmendra Kumar Dixit, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. The instant writ petition has been filed contending that despite the petitioner being eligible for the post of Senior Clerk, his claim for promotion has not been considered till date. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the reliefs sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before the respondent no.3 i.e. Vice Chairman, Rae Bareilly Development Authority, Rae Bareli which may be
directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned Counsel for the respondents has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and the relevant rules within a further period of three months from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 13.8.2025 J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench