Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15533 (KAR)

SMT KRISHNA KUMARI KOKA v. M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED

WP/51862/2013 · 2025-01-08

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:545 WP No. 51862 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 51862 OF 2013 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. KRISHNA KUMARI KOKA W/O KISHORE.N.KOKA, SENIOR CITIZEN AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 2. PROF. KISHORE.N.KOKA S/O JAGANNADHA RAO, SENIOR CITIZEN AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, BOTH ARE RESIDING AT KAY KAY HEIGHTS, NO 104/75, 2ND MAIN, CHAMARAJPET, BANGALORE-560 018. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KISHORE.N.KOKA., PARTY-IN-PERSON [ABSENT]) AND: 1. M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED, REGISTERED OFFICE : 36-38Z, NARIMAN BHAVAN, 227, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI-400 021. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. 2. M/S. CITI FINANCIAL CONSUMER FINANCE INDIA LTD., NO.162, SHREE CENTER, AECS LAYOUT, RAJAGOPAL ROAD, SANJAYNAGAR, BANGALORE-94, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:545 WP No. 51862 of 2013 3. M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LIMITED, NO.59, SREE COMPLEX, BHSC 'T' BLOCK, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA-560 085, INDIA. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAI PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING RESPONDENT ON I.A.3/2014; R1 & 2-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioners party in person is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the party in person must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet the petition was listed on 24.10.2024 and 30.10.2024, on these days, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. A perusal of the petition papers reveals that the petition is filed in the year 2013. Now we are in the month of January 2025. The petition is pending for almost twelve years. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioners are not represented. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:545 WP No. 51862 of 2013 the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 15