Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155313 (ALL)

RAJJAN ALI @ RAJJAN AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

NA528/871/2025 · 2025-07-31

Subhash Vidyarthi

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44560 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 871 of 2025 Applicant :- Rajjan Ali @ Rajjan And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Durgesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Durgesh Kumar Pathak, the learned counsel for the applicants as well as Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicants to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in four cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submit that it is impossible for the applicants to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicants has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicants are still in jail inasmuch as the applicants being a poor persons, are unable to produce the sureties in each case, details of which are as follows- (i) Case Crime No.94/2025 u/S 331(4), 305(a), 317(2) of BNS at Police Station- Fakharpur, District- Bahraich. (ii) Case Crime No.186/2025 u/S 305(a), 317(2), 331(4) of BNS at Police Station- Fakharpur, District- Bahraich. (iii) Case Crime No.187/2025 u/S 305(a), 317(2), 331(4) of BNS at Police Station- Fakharpur, District- Bahraich. (iv) Case Crime No.190/2025 u/S 109(1), 3(5), 317(2), 313, 317(5) of BNS & 3/25 of Arms Act at Police Station- Fakharpur, District- Bahraich. 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicants that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicants shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other three cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 31.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench