BIPIN KUMAR PANDEY @ VIPIN PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
/878/2025 · 2025-08-05
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155311 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155311 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45553 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 878 of 2025 Applicant :- Bipin Kumar Pandey @ Vipin Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Roshan Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.
2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed with prayer for quashing of the charge sheet dated 25.10.2024 and summoning order dated 3.1.2025 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No-17,Sultanpur arising out in Crime No. 321/2024, Case No. 38/2025, Under Section- 118(1), 352, 351(3), 110, 333 B.N.S. P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District- Sultanpur (State Versus Vipin Kumar Pandey) and further be pleased to stay the entire proceedings arising out of Crime No. 321/2024, Case No. 38/2025, Under Section 118(1), 352, 351(3), 110, 333 B.N.S. P.S. Kotwali Dehat, District-Sultanpur (State Versus Vipin Kumar Pandey) pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No-17,Sultanpur.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case with false and frivolous allegations. He further added that the applicant is not involved in committing the alleged offence as has been mentioned in the first information report.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the application and seeks liberty to file bail application before the learned trial court which may be decided in view of law laid by Hon'ble Supreme Court's
judgment in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022)10 SCC 51.
5. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by
learned counsel for the applicant.
6. On due consideration to the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, it is provided that in case, the applicant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and files bail
application, the same shall be decided expeditiously in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra).
7. Further, the applicants will have an opportunity at the appropriate stage to move an application for discharge taking therein all the pleas factual and legal which may be available to them, in accordance with law. In case, such an application is moved before the learned trial court, the learned trial court shall dispose of the same by a speaking and reasoned order strictly, in accordance with law.
8. The application is disposed off accordingly.
Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench