Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15529 (HP)

SHASHANK BISHT v. State of HP

CRMPM/1213/2025 · 2025-06-03

Virender Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:17302 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr. MP (M) No. :  1213 of 2025 Decided on    : 3rd June, 2025 Shashank Bisht …Applicant Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh,  Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the applicant      :  Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advocate. For the respondent   : Mr.   Mohinder   Zharaick,   Additional Advocate   General   assisted   by   HC Shashi   Pal,   No.39,   Police   Station Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. Virender Singh, Judge Applicant­Shashank Bisht has filed the present application, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha   Sanhita,   2023   (hereinafter   referred   to   as   the 'BNSS'), with a prayer to release him on bail, during the pendency of trial, in case arising out of FIR No.17 of 2025, dated 22.01.2025, registered, under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2025:HHC:17302 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS Act’), and Section 132 and   121(1)   of   the   Bharatiya   Nyaya   Sanhita   (hereinafter referred to as the BNS), with Police Station, Dharamshala, District Kangra, H.P. 2. According   to   the   applicant,   he   is   innocent person and has falsely been implicated by the Police in the present case and presently, he is in judicial custody. 3. The   applicant   has   put   forward   the   fact   that except the present case, no other case has been registered against him. 4. As per the applicant, the investigation, in the present case, is complete and no useful purpose would be served by keeping him in judicial custody, as chances of commencement and conclusion of the trial against him, in near future, are not so bright. 5. Applicant   has   filed   similar   application   before learned Special Judge­III, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra, however, his application has been dismissed vide order dated 24.04.2025. 6. On the basis of the above facts, learned counsel appearing for the applicant has given certain undertakings, 3 2025:HHC:17302 to which, the applicant is ready to abide by, in case, the applicant is ordered to be released on bail. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is entitled for the relief of bail on the ground of parity also, as, his co­accused Ayush Soni, Jermanjeet Kaur and Shwetang Kumar Sahi, have already been released on bail, by this Court, vide orders dated   15.05.2025/23.05.2025,   passed   in   Cr.MP(M) Nos.954, 1007 & 1123 of 2025. 8. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the applications. 8. When   put   to   notice,   the   police   has   filed   the status   report,   disclosing   therein,   on   22.01.2025,   HC Shashi Pal No.39, along with other police officials, was on patrolling duty in official vehicle No.HP39E­3253. 9.1. At about 12.50 a.m., in the midnight, when the I.O.,   along   with   other   police   officials,   reached   at   Petrol Pump Sakoh, then he noticed a vehicle coming in the high speed from Gaggal side. 9.2. On seeing the police vehicle, driver of the said vehicle, all of a sudden take a cut and drove the vehicle at 4 2025:HHC:17302 a very high speed towards Sakoh side, as such, the I.O. raised suspicion in his mind that some objectionable item could be there in the  vehicle, as such,  he directed the driver of his vehicle to chase the said vehicle, registration number of which was HP39B­9902. 9.3. When,   the   police   vehicle   was   chasing   the vehicle   bearing   registration   No.HP39B­9902,   its   driver increased its speed, upon which, the I.O. informed SI Vijay Singh, who was already on patrolling, to intercept the said vehicle coming on the Sakoh road. 9.4. After chasing the said vehicle, the driver of the said vehicle drove the vehicle through Radio Colony link road   towards   Chilgadi,   however,   in   that   process,   the vehicle struck against the RCC retaining wall. Thereafter, three   boys   were   found   to   have   alighted   down   from   the vehicle, who ran towards Rodikut road side. 9.5. One boy was nabbed by ASI Vijay Singh, at a distance of 20 meters, however, other persons could not be nabbed, as it was the night time. The person, so nabbed, gave a fist blow on the right eye of ASI Vijay Singh. The said person was overpowered by other police officials. On 5 2025:HHC:17302 inquiry,   he   disclosed   his   name   as   Shanshak   Bisht (applicant). He also disclosed the names of his companion, who allegedly ran away from the sport, as Ayush Soni and Shwetang Shahi @ Shinu. 9.6. Constable Abhishek Kumar was sent to arrange independent witness. At about 1.25 a.m., he came back with one person namely Manoj Kumar, who was associated as   independent   witness. In   the   presence   of   said independent   witnesses,   the   vehicle   was   searched   and during search, from underneath the foot mat of front seat, a transparent polythene was found along with electronic weighing scale. 9.7. When  the said  polythene  was  opened, brown coloured granular shaped substance was found, which on smelling and on the basis of experience was found to be Chitta/heroin. Accused Shashank Bisht (applicant) also confirmed the said fact. On weighment, the same was found to be 30 grams of Chitta. 10. After completion of other codal formalities, the FIR,   in   question,   was   registered   and   the   accused   was 6 2025:HHC:17302 arrested. The contraband along with the vehicle was taken into possession. 11. Thereafter, the medico­legal examination of ASI Vijay Singh was got conducted. On 22.1.2025, accused Ayush   Soni   and   applicant   Shwetang   Kumar   Shahi   @ Shinu, were also associated in the investigation and were arrested. 12. During investigation, accused Ayush Soni and Shwetang   Kumar   Shahi   @   Shinu,   has   disclosed   that Raman   Kumar   is   also   dealing   in   the   business   of Chitta/Heroin. FIR   No.13/25,   dated   15.1.2025,   under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, was found to be registered with Police Station, Dharamshala against accused Raman Kumar @ Rambo. 13. Raman Kumar has introduced accused Ayush Soni   and   Shwetang   Kumar   Shahi   @   Shinu   with   the smuggler of Chitta namely Maninder Singh. Against said Maninder   Singh,   case   bearing   FIR   No.18/25,   dated 24.01.2025, registered under Section 21, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act was found to be registered with Police Station 7 2025:HHC:17302 Dharamshala. Accused Raman Kumar was arrested in FIR No.13/25 on 15.1.2025. 14. During investigation, involvement of Maninder Singh and Rakesh Kumar was also found, who were stated to have been arrested in FIR No.18/25. 15. On 24.1.2025, custody of Maninder Singh and Rakesh Kumar was transferred from case No.18/25 to this case and they were arrested on 27.1.2025. 16. During   investigation,   it   has   also   been   found that   accused   Ayush   and   Shinu   used   to   transfer   the amount   in   the   account   of   one   Kulwant   Kaur   and thereafter, Kulwant Kaur used to transfer the said amount in the account of accused Jermanjeet Kaur. 17. Accused Shwetang Kumar Sahi has transferred a sum of Rs.1,88,000/­, whereas, accused Ayush Soni has transferred   a   sum   of   Rs.2,53,000/­   to   the   account   of Kulwant   Kaur. The   said   amount   was   transferred   for purchasing Chita. Accused Jermanjeet Kaur in connivance with   her   mother   has   transferred   the   amount   of Rs.8,40,370/­ in her bank account. 8 2025:HHC:17302 18. Thereafter, the service provider was requested to   provide   the   CDRs   of   mobile   number   of   accused Shwetang Kumar Shahi, Ayush, Shashank (applicant) and Jermanjeet Kaur. On perusal of those CDRs, location of accused   Ayush,   Shashank   (applicant)   and   Shwetang Kumar Shahi  was found to be in the area of Dharamshala to Daulatpur, on 21.01.2025, at 4.30 p.m., whereas, their location was found to be at Dharamshala, on 12.30 a.m, at 22.1.2025. 19. It has also been found in the investigation that accused Shwetang Kumar Ayush and Shashank (applicant) had purchased Chitta from accused Maninder Singh and Rakesh Kumar at Mubarikpur, during night of 21.1.2025. Accused Maninder Singh and Rakesh Kumar were arrested in FIR No. 18/25, registered under Section 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. Accused Kulwant Kaur was arrested on 2.3.2025. 20. During investigation, it was found that accused Kulwant   Kaur   had   transferred   the   said   amount   to   the account   of   her   daughter   accused   Jermanjeet   Kaur   and accused Jermanjeet Kaur  was  proceeding towards Delhi 9 2025:HHC:17302 Airport,   as   her   flight   to   Canada   was   scheduled   for 3.3.2025, at 5.35 a.m.  She was nabbed at Delhi Airport on 3.3.2025, at about 3.30 a.m. and was arrested. 21. After   completion   of   the   investigation,   charge­ sheet  has  been  filed   against  accused   Ayush,  Shwetang, Shashank   (applicant),   Maninder   Rakesh,   Kulwant   Kaur and Jermanjeet Kaur, in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge­III, Kangra at Dharamshala. The case is now fixed for consideration on charge. 22. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to dismiss the application. 23. The   contraband   allegedly   recovered   from   the possession of accused persons, in this case, does not fall within   the   definition   of   commercial   quantity,   as   such, rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not applicable, in the present case. 24. Once, it has been held that rigors of Section 37 of   the   NDPS   Act   are   not   applicable,   then,   the   next question, which arises for determination, before this Court, 10 2025:HHC:17302 is as to whether the applicant is entitled to the relief, as claimed in the application or not. 25. Investigation, in the present case, is complete as such, it can be said that the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required by the Police. Moreover, the chances   of   commencement   and   conclusion   of   the   trial against the accused persons, in near future, are not so bright. 26. Except the present case, no other case is found to have been registered against the applicant, as such, the presumption of innocence is still available to the applicant. 27. The bail  application  cannot  be rejected, as  a matter   of   punishment,   as,   pre­trial   punishment   is prohibited   under   the   law   and   punishment   can   only   be imposed, after the full fledged trial, by competent Court of law. 28. Moreover, on the ground of parity, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail, as, his co­accused Ayush Soni, Jermanjeet  Kaur  and Shwetang Kumar  Sahi have already been released, on bail, by this Court, vide order dated 15.05.2025/23.05.2025. 11 2025:HHC:17302 29. Considering all these facts, this Court is of the view that the bail application is liable to be allowed and is accordingly allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on   bail   in   case   FIR   No.17   of   2025,   dated   22.01.2025, registered, under Sections 21, 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act and Sections 132 & 121(1) of the BNS, with Police Station, Dharamshala,   District   Kangra,   H.P.,   on   his   furnishing personal   bonds,   in   the   sum   of   Rs.70,000/­,   with   two sureties, in the like amount, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court. 29. This order of release, however, shall be subject to the following conditions :­ “a)   Applicant shall regularly attend the trial Court on   each   and   every   date     of     hearing   and   if prevented   by   any   reason   to   do   so,   seek exemption from appearance by filing appropriate application; b) Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence   nor   hamper   the   investigation   of   the case in   any   manner whatsoever; c)     Applicant shall not make any inducement, threat or promises to any person acquainted with the facts of   the case   so   as   to   dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or the Police Officer; and d) Applicant shall not leave the territory of India without the prior permission of the Court.” 12 2025:HHC:17302 30. Any of the observations made herein above shall not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case as these observations are confined only to the disposal of the present bail application. 31. It is made clear that the respondent­State is at liberty to move an appropriate application, in case, any of the bail conditions is found to be violated by the applicant. 32. The Registry is directed to forward a soft copy of the bail order to the Superintendent of Jail, Lala Lajpat Rai Open   Air   Correctional   Home,   Dharamshala,   District Kangra, through e­mail, with a direction to enter the date of grant of bail in the e­prison software. 33. In case, the   applicant is not released within a period of seven   days   from   the   date   of   grant of bail, the  Superintendent   of   Jail,   Lala   Lajpat   Rai   Open   Air Correctional   Home,   Dharamshala,   District   Kangra,  is directed to inform this fact to the Secretary, DLSA, Kangra at Dharamshala. The  Superintendent of Jail, Lala Lajpat Rai   Open   Air   Correctional   Home,   Dharamshala,   District Kangra,  is further directed that if the applicant fails to 13 2025:HHC:17302 furnish the bail bonds, as per the order passed by this Court, within a period of one month from today, then, the said fact be submitted to this Court. ( Virender Singh ) Judge June 03, 2025(ps) Digitally signed by RAJNI Date: 2025.06.03 14:51:52 IST