Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155255 (ALL)

ASHA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COMMISSIONER AND SECY. BOARD OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/7381/2025 · 2025-08-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45404-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7381 of 2025 Petitioner :- Asha Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Commissioner And Secy. Board Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naresh Singh,Rajjan Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following relief(s): "(a) a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party No. 2 to Consider and take a appropriate decision by passing a reasoned order on the claim of the petitioner sent by the opposite party No. 3 to the opposite party No. 2 on 18.10.2022 which was pending before the opposite party No. 2 is Annexed as Annexure No. 1 to the instant writ petition. (b) a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 2, to consider and take a decision on application dated 02.12.2024 regarding the claim of the petitioner on merit as contained as Annexure no. 9 to this writ petition in the interest of Justice.." 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the application filed by the petitioner has been pending since long i.e. since 18.10.2022. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State has produced the instructions dated 29.07.2025 sent by the Tehsildar Sadar, Raebareli, wherein it has been stated that the claim of the petitioner has been rejected, as being time barred on 15.09.2023 by the District Magistrate/District Level Committee. 5. Consequently, the petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition, challenging the aforesaid order dated 15.09.2023, if he so chooses. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that a copy of the order passed by the District Magistrate/District Level Committee, rejecting the petitioner's claim be provided to him. 7. We direct the learned Standing Counsel to provide a copy of the order dated 15.9.2023 passed by the District Magistrate/District Level Committee to the petitioner. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench