CHANDAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF PANCHAYATI RAJ LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/8570/2025 · 2025-08-05
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155239 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 155239 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45210 Court No. - 8 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8570 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chandan Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for payment of salary/subsistence allowance for the period of suspension i.e. 25.10.2012 till
14.06.2016.
3. With regard to aforesaid grievance, petitioner is said to have submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before authority concerned.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner restricts prayer for decision on representation of petitioner.
5. Considering the innocuous prayer, without adverting to merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.3 i.e. District Panchayat Raj Officer, Pratapgarh. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of eight weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order.
6. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally
disposed of.
Order Date :- 5.8.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench