Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3628 of 2025
Karnail Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3630 of 2025
Jogendra Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3635 of 2025
Lal Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3636 of 2025
Kulvinder Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And
2
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3637 of 2025
Sukhvindar Kaur and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3638 of 2025
Nishan Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3639 of 2025
Paramjeet Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3640 of 2025
Manjeet Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And
3
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3641 of 2025
Amar Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3644 of 2025
Karanpal Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3645 of 2025
Bhoori and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3646 of 2025
Gurmeet Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.
N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And
4
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3647 of 2025
Jagdish Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3649 of 2025
Satnam Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3650 of 2025
Charan Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3651 of 2025
Chandrapal Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And
5
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3652 of 2025
Amrik Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3654 of 2025
Pratap Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3656 of 2025
Chandra Sain
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3657 of 2025
Balveer Kaur
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3658 of 2025
6
Sukhvinder Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3659 of 2025
Jogendra Singh and others
....Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.
N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3660 of 2025
Balveer Kaur and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3663 of 2025
Harvinder Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3664 of 2025
Preetam Singh and another
...Petitioners
7
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3665 of 2025
Sahabjot Singh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. And Writ Petition (M/S) No.3666 of 2025
Balvindar Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
District Magistrate and another
….Respondents
Present: Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, D.A.G. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)
Since common question of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, they are heard together and decided by this common judgment. 2. The petitioners seek direction to the respondents to get their names mutated over the ceiling land. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 8
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that identical controversy has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025, in WPMS No. 3367 of 2025, Anup Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others and connected petitions and the petitioners in those petitions have been directed to make separate application to the District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar.
5.
Learned counsel for the respondents admits this fact.
6.
Since the identical issue has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025 in the case of Anup Singh (supra), all these petitions are decided in terms of judgment dated 16.12.2025 passed in the case of Anup Singh (supra).
7.
Accordingly, the petitioners are given liberty to make separate application(s) to District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar, for correcting of the provision invoked for allotting land to them. If such representation(s) is made within two weeks from today, District Magistrate shall examine the matter and pass appropriate order, within eight weeks thereafter. Stake holders, if any, shall also be heard while taking any decision in the matters.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
29.12.2025 Jitendra