Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155211 (ALL)

RAM SHANKAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 9 OTHERS

/7336/2025 · 2025-08-04

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45088-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7336 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Shankar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel, who appears on behalf of State-Respondents. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayers : "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties specially opposite party no. 4 not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner not try to provide possession to the private opposite parties of the writ petition." We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at some length and have also perused the pleadings on record. It appears that the petitioner is aggrieved by the actions of opposite party nos.5 to 10, who are private respondents. Since the writ petition raises disputed questions of fact which can be adjudicated by a civil court, it is dismissed accordingly, with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum. Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Mahesh Digitally signed by :- MAHESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench