M/S HRD COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE PVT LTD v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/4409/2020 · 2025-05-28
Michael Zothankhuma
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15519 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15519 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010147812020
2025:GAU-AS:6902
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4409/2020 M/S HRD COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE PVT LTD REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MD. SUHEL AHMED, S/O JALAL UDDIN, HEAD OFFICE ST ROAD, BADARPUR, DIST KARIMGANJ, ASSAM 788803 REGIONAL OFFICE LANE NO. 09 H NO. 3, ZOO ROAD TINAILI, GUWAHATI 781024, KAMRUP M ASSAM VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS, THROUGH THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI 110001 2:SENIOR MANAGER (CONTRACTS AND PROCUREMENT ) BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED C AND P DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO LEPETKATA 786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 3:DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (HR)/EIC BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED
C AND P DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO LEPETKATA 786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 4:GENERAL MANAGER(HR) BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED C AND P DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO LEPETKATA 786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2 5:MANAGER (HR) BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED C AND P DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO LEPETKATA 786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 6:CHIEF MANAGER ( C AND P) BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED
ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING PO LEPETKATA 786006 DIST DIBRUGARH ASSAM 7:M/S BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING P.O- LEPETKATA PIN- 786006 DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SAHU, MR. M K ALI Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., MR. N DEKA,MR. M GOGOI
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA ORDER Date : 29.05.2025 Mr. S. Sahu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Mr. N. Deka, learned counsel appears for the respondents. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant