NAVEEN S/O SHRI VALLABH CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5108/2025 · 2025-05-20
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15518 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15518 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21248] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5108/2025 Naveen S/o Shri Vallabh Chand, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 31, Nala Ka Bas, Near Nani Gate, Police Station Kotwali Sikar, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, Dy.GA., Mr. Ved Prakash Sogarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 20/05/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.86/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali, Sikar, District Sikar for the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118(2), 109(1) of BNS and 4/25 of Arms Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and both the co-accused persons have already been released on bail by the Court of Session, Sikar. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 05.03.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed and the trial of the case will take considerable time,
[2025:RJ-JP:21248] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5108/2025] therefore, further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that both the co- accused persons have already been released on bail by the Court of Session, Sikar and the petitioner is in custody since 05.03.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow this bail application.
6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner Naveen S/o Shri Vallabh Chand shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/198