CR-6275-2018 [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6275-2018 Date of decision: 27.08.2025 Saravjit Singh @ Sarabjeet Singh and another ...Pe""oner Versus Gobind and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. Ni"n Jain, Advocate and Ms. Vanshika Sharma, Advocate for the pe""oner. Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. A suit for seeking decree of permanent injunc"on filed by plain"ff Saravjit Singh and another (pe""oner herein) was dismissed by the trial Court on 06.08.2018 vide Annexure P-5. The said plain"ffs filed appeal and along with the same, have also moved an applica"on under Order 41 Rule 5, Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Sec"on 151 CPC. That applica"on has been disposed of by the First Appellate Court vide impugned order dated 15.09.2018.. 2. It is informed by the learned counsel for the pe""oner that main appeal is s"ll pending. Learned counsel submits that purpose of both the par"es will be served in case direc"on is given to the concerned Appellate Court to dispose of the main appeal and in the mean"me, both the par"es may be directed to maintain status quo. 3. Considering the fact that appeal filed before the First Appellate Court pertains to the year 2018 and order impugned before this Court is only an interim order, so present pe""on is hereby disposed of with direc"on to the Appellate Court concerned to dispose of the main appeal Yogesh Mehta 2025.08.27 17:34 I agree to specified portions of this document CR-6275-2018 [2] i.e. CA-331-2018 "tled Saravjit Singh and another Vs. Gobind and another, preferably within next six months posi"vely. 4. In the mean"me, both the par"es shall maintain status quo regarding the property in dispute. 27.08.2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) Yogesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No Yogesh Mehta 2025.08.27 17:34 I agree to specified portions of this document