Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155168 (ALL)

KRISHNA AVATAR SINGH THRU. HIS WIFE ROSHNI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

/281/2025 · 2025-08-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 9 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 281 of 2025 Petitioner :- Krishna Avatar Singh Thru. His Wife Roshni Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Punit Kumar Srivastava, Ishank Srivastava, Rakesh Srivastava, Shashank Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J. 1. Heard Sri Abhishek Mishra, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ishank Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State respondent. 2. This is a Habeas Corpus writ petition filed by the wife of the detenue seeking his presence before the Court apprising that the detenue has been detained at Police Station Banthara, District Lucknow without assigning the reason. 3. Sri G.D. Bhatt, learned A.G.A. has produced the copy of the instruction letter dated 31.07.2025 provided by one Harendra Yadav, Sub Inspector, Police Station Banthara, Lucknow apprising that the team relating to Cyber Crime from Police Station Gurugram, District Gurugram (Haryana) came to the Police Station on 23.07.2025 to know the whereabouts of the detenue and police personnel of Police Station Banthara apprised the address of the detenue to such Cyber Crime team of Gurugram. Thereafter, the Cyber Crime team of Gurugram proceeded towards the residence of the detenue but no police personnel of Police Station Banthata, District Lucknow has accompanied the team of Cyber Crime, Gurugram. No case of any kind whatsoever has been registered against the detenue at Police Station Banthara, Lucknow. Mr. Bhatt, on the basis of specific instruction, has further submitted that the detenue has not been detained at Police Station Banthara, Lucknow and his whereabouts are not aware to him. The copy of the aforesaid instruction has been provided to the learned counsel for the detenue. 4. Having considered the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition, therefore, this writ petition is dismissed. 5. Consigned to the records. 6. However, it is always open to the detenue or his family members/friends to file an appropriate application/petition before the appropriate Court of law. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi, J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.) Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench