Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155164 (ALL)

BADRULNISHA @ BADARULANISHA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/4576/2025 · 2025-08-01

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44830 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4576 of 2025 Petitioner :- Badrulnisha @ Badarulanisha Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shesh Mani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent No.s 1 and 2 while notice on behalf of the Gaon Sabha- respondent No.4 has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent No.3 is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 -Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Raaniganj, District Pratapgarh to decide Regular Suit No.RST00155 of 2015, computerized case No.T 201502570500155 "Badrulnisha Vs. Mansur Ahmed and othters", under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act (now Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006), expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner, to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Raaniganj, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide Regular Suit No.RST00155 of 2015, computerized case No.T 201502570500155 "Badrulnisha Vs. Mansur Ahmed and othters", under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act (now Section 144 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006), expeditiously, say within a period of six months, if possible, from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if there is no legal impediment. 6. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 7. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 1.8.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench