Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15515 (JHR)

BUDESWAR RUHIDAS ALIAS DARU RUIDAS ALIAS DADHU RUHIDAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3029/2025 · 2025-06-05

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14531 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3029 of 2025 ----- Budeswar Ruhidas @ Daru Ruidas @ Dadhu Ruhidas S/o Dulal Ruhidas, aged about 52 years, residents of H.No.29, Lupungdih, Lohabasa, P.O. & P.S. Birsanagar, District-East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur .......... Petitioner(s). -Versus- The State of Jharkhand . ........ Opp. Party. ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ----- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr Shukla, APP. ----- 02/Dated: 05th June, 2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail from apprehending his arrest instituted under Section 47(a) of Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that nothing had been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner neither he was apprehended from the place of occurrence. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovered illegal Jawa Mahua and country made liquor. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Complaint Case No.2086 of 2020 with the condition that he will co- operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhaar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. It is made clear that if the 2025:JHHC:14531 Page | 2 petitioner does not cooperate with the investigation/trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Sandeep/Rahul