Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155144 (ALL)

DURGESH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER

/968/2025 · 2025-08-04

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45151 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 968 of 2025 Applicant :- Durgesh Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Angad Kumar Vishwakarma, learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.150/2025, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster & Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Deeh, District Raebareli. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 20.06.2025 against 8 persons, including the applicant, alleging that the accused persons had formed a gang and they are involved in commission of heinous offences. Gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in a solitary case in which he has already been granted bail. 4. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 5. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without making any observations which may affect the outcome of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. 6. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Durgesh Pandey before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court' (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench