- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1753 WP No. 26479 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 26479 OF 2017 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: THE SECRETARY, MADHUVAN HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO.41, 42, V.V.MARKET BUILDING, AGRAHARA, K.R.MOHALLA, MYSORE-560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRANAV., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. NITYANAND.V.NAIK., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI K.NAGENDRA PRASAD S/O KRISHNAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.23, 6TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS, SARASWATHIPURAM, MYSORE-570 009. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1753 WP No. 26479 of 2017 ORAL ORDER Sri.Pranav., counsel on behalf of Sri.Nityanand V.Naik., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner about withdrawal of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14