THE AIRPORTS AUTHORITY INDIA AND 5 ORS v. PRAVEEN VS AND ANR
I.A.(Civil)/3155/2024 · 2025-04-29
N Unni Krishnan Nair
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15514 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15514 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010147982024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3155/2024 In WA No.8318/2024 (Filing Number) 1.THE AIRPORTS AUTHORITY INDIA AND 5 ORS REP. BY THE REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REGIONAL HEADQUARTER, NORTH EASTERN REGION, LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, GHY, ASSAM- 781015 2: THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA REGIONAL HEADQUARTER NORTH EASTERN REGION LOKPRIYA GOPINATH BORDOLOI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT GHY ASSAM- 781015 3: THE GENERAL MANAGER (HR) AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT NEW DELHI- 110003 4: THE CHAIRMAN DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA SAFDARJUNG AIRPORT NEW DELHI- 110003 5: THE GENERAJL MANAGER (HR) (INQUIRY OFFICER) AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA NETAJI SUBHASH CHANDRA BOSE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT KOLKATA-700052 6: INTERNAL COMPLAINTS COMMITTEE REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS NORTH EASTERN REGION REP BY THE CHAIRPERSO VERSUS
Page No.# 2/3 1.PRAVEEN VS AND ANR S/O- K SAHARAN NAIR, PRIYAS VAMANAPURAM POST, THIRUNANANTHAPURAM, KERALA.
PERMANENT ADDRESS- AND PRESENTLY HOLDING THE POST OF JT. GM (COMMERCIAL), AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND POSTED AT JAY PRAKASH NARAYAN INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, PATNA 2:MS. PHIBAHUNLANG SWER ASSTT. MANAGER (COMMERCIAL) AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA IMPHAL AIRPORT IMPHAL.
PRESENTLY SERVING AS MANAGER (COMMERCIAL) NSCBI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT KOLKATA For the Applicant(s) : Mr. R. Dubey, Advocate. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. V. Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.1.
– BEFORE – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
30.04.2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)
The matter comes upon for consideration of this Interlocutory Application [I.A. (Civil) No.3155/2024] filed on behalf of the applicants with the prayer to condone the delay of 117 days occasioned in filing the connected writ appeal. Mr. V. Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 has opposed the prayer for condonation of delay. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the contents of the Interlocutory Application, we are of the view that the delay of 117 days in filing the connected writ appeal is liable to be condoned. Hence, the Interlocutory Application is allowed and the delay of 117 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned.
Page No.# 3/3 Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same before this Court for admission after 3(three) weeks.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant