Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1551 (AP)

The Prahalada Consumers Cooperative Central Stores Limited, v. Sri.Manazeer Jilani Samoon,IAS,

CC/1406/2025 · 2026-05-03

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010266982025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1406 of 2025 Between: 1. THE PRAHALADA CONSUMERS COOPERATIVE CENTRAL STORES LIMITED,, NO.428-F KORUKOLLU, PALAKODERU MANDAL,W.G.DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT M.YOGENDRA KUMAR, S/O.M.VENKATA PRAHALADA RAJU,AGED 49 YEARS. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI MANAZEER JILANI SAMOON IAS, THE VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION,VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. A SRINIVAS, THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER ELURU,ELURU DISTRICT,AP. 3. M NAGARAJU, THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, BHIMAVARAM, AP ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for willful, wanton, disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court dated.12.07.2024 passed in W.P.No.7576 of 2024 by the Hon'ble Lordships. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VALLEPU JAGADEESH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 2 1. MD.SALEEM SC For APSCSC Limited,Vijayawda 2. BH RAMA KRISHNA NAIK The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Court has disposed of the Writ Petition No.7576 of 2024 on 12.07.2024, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 27.02.2024 made by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders and communicate the said decision to the petitioner herein stipulating four weeks time from the date of receipt of representation. The respondent authorities have examined the representation dated 27.02.2024 and passed orders and the said decision was not communicated to the petitioner herein. As such, the present Contempt Case came to be filed. 2. As the respondents have disposed of the representation dated 27.02.2024, as directed by this Court, nothing survives to adjudicate further in the present Contempt Case. 3. Accordingly, the Contempt Case stands closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the order dated 30.10.2024 delivered by the 1st respondent in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 04.05.2026 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1406 of 2025 Date: 04.05.2026 siva