Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15509 (KAR)

SMT. YASHODHA v. SRI GOWRISH D.B.

RFA/249/2024 · 2025-01-28

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3889 RFA No. 249 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 249 OF 2024 (SP) BETWEEN: SMT. YASHODHA W/O H.D.GUDDE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS NO.17, OM SHAKTHI TEMPLE ROAD LAKSHMANANAGAR HEGGANAHALLI CROSS VISHWANEEDAM POST BENGALURU - 560 091. …APPELLANT (BY SRI SHAIKH SAOUD, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: SRI GOWRISH D. B., S/O BASAVARAJU AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT DONEKUPPA VILLAGE AGALAKOOTTE POST, MAGADI TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 120. …RESPONDENT THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC 1908. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3889 RFA No. 249 of 2024 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the appeal was listed before the Court on 13.01.2025, on that day, finally two week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections' on 28.01.2025 The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the Regular - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3889 RFA No. 249 of 2024 First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32