Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15509 (CHH)

SMT. MAHI BATRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/834/2023 · 2025-08-06

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:39427 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 834 of 2023 Smt. Mahi Batra W/o Minshu Batra Aged About 36 Years R/o 201, Block-B, GT Nachura Daldal Sivni, Mova, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Pandri, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ajay Kumar Dubey S/o Shivshankar Dubey Aged About 42 Years R/o Near Agrawal Dairy, Shankar Nagar, Khamhardih, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Navin Shukla, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Senior Advocate (through Video Conferencing) alongwith Mr. Abhyuday Singh, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 07/08/2025 1 By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR bearing Crime No. 2 312/2022, registered at Police Station, Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur, for the offences punishable under Sections 419, 468, 471, 120-B of the IPC and Section 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2000 at the instance of respondent No. 2/complainant and further the entire criminal proceedings arising therefrom against the petitioner. 2 Mr. Sakib Ahmed, learned counsel appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 submits that the investigation in the present matter has already been concluded and the police has filed its closure report and as such, nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition. 3 Since the closure report has been filed in this case, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication and the same accordingly stands disposed of. However, the respondent No. 2 is at liberty to take recourse to law, if he is aggrieved by the said closure report. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.08.07 20:37:36 +0530