IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE O 'Mr 1 for > o io PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO g/H * APPEAL SUIT NO: 236 OF 201 a Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 29-01-2013 passed in O.S No. 41 of 2010 on the file of the XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Krishna District at Gudivada. Between: 1. Jupudi Satyanarayana, S/o.late Radha Venakta Krishnayya Occ: Hindu, R/o.D.No.8/203-1, Aged about 53 Business years, Gowrisankarapuram, Gudivada, Krishna District, J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 2. Jupudi Hema Krishna Prasad, S/o.Satyanarayana, Hindu, Aged about 28 years, Occ: Student R/o.D.No.8/203-1, Gowrisankarapuram, Gudivada, Krishna District, J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 3. Jupudi Phaneendra, S/o.Satyanarayana, Hindu, Aged about 27 Occ; Student R/o.D.No.8/2003-1, Krishna District, J.C.J.C. Gudivada. years, Gowrisankarapuram, Gudivada, ...Appellants/Plaintiffs AND 1. Jupudi Siva Prasad, S/o.Late Radha, (Died per LRs 6 and 7) 2. Kanigalapula Venkata Subba Rao, S/o.Venkateswarlu, Hindu Occ; Business R/o.D.No. 15/32-4, Park Road, Gangamma Street 521 301, Krishna District. J.C.J.C. Gudivada. Gudivada - Prasad, S/o.Not Mention, Hindu Occ; Pawan Broker R/o.D.No.15/32-4, Park Road, Gangamma Street, Gudivada - 3. Gurrala Leela Business 521 301, Krishna District. J.C.J.C. Gudivada. Salmon Raju, S/o.Not Mention, Hindu Occ; Electrical Motor Mechanic R/o.D.No.15/32-4, Park Road, Gangamma Street, Gudivada - 521 301, Krishna District. J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 5. Zilani, S/o.Not Mention, Muslim Occ; Tailoring R/o.D.No.15/32 -4, Park Road, Gangamma Street, Gudivada - 521 301, Krishna District. J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 6. Jupudi Kamala Kumari, W/o. late Siva Prasad, Hindu, Aged 58 years. House Wife, R/o. D.No.16-140, Satyanarayanapuram, Gudivada, Krishna District. 7. Thatavarthi Maninagalakshmikumari, W/o. Surendra Kumar, Hindu, Aged 32 years, R/o. Lakshmi narasimha Traders, M.G.C Complex, Shop No.240, Gollapudi, Krishna District. 4. Kagithya record as LRs of (Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 are brought on deceased respondent no. 1 vide Court order dated 24.01.2025 in I.A.No.l of 2021 in A.S.No.236 of 2013). ...Respondents lA NO: 1 OF 2025 under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the Memorandum of Terms and Conditions of Compromise entered in between the Appellant Nos. 1 to 3 and Respondents 6 & 7, accordingly pass the Decree in A.S.No.236 of 2013 by making the said Memorandum of Terms and Conditions of Compromise as well as Sketch as part of the Decree. Petition T I 'C Counsel for the Appellants; SRI NARASIMHA RAO GUDISEVA Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7: SRI B.V. ANJANEYULU The Court made the following; COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at AWIARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY ™ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT honourable SRI JUSTICE ^ppFAl SUIT Noi236/2013 APHC010197652013 IN THE HIGH [3369] T MALLIKARJUNA RAO THE Between; 1.JUPUD1 krishnayya gowrisankarapuram, J cj.c.gudivada. venakta R/O.D.NO.8/2003-1, district, radha s/0, late business gudivada satyanarayana, OCC; HINDU KRISHNA , J.C.J.C.GUDIVADA. 2 JUPUDl HEMA OCC; STUDENT GUDIVADA. KRISHNA DISTRICT r;0 SATYANARAYANA HINDU. OCC. gowrisankarapuram. ’J.C.J.C.GUDIVADA. 3 JUPUDl PHANEENDRA. r/O.D.NO.8/2003-1 gudivada. KRISHNA DISTRICT ...APPELLANT(S) AND KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1 S/O.VENKATESWARLU, park ROAD, KRISHNA DISTRICT. VENKATA SUBBA RAO R/O.D. NO. 15/32-4 521 301, 2.KAN1GALAPULA HINDU OCC: GANGAMMA J.C.J.C.GUDIVADA. business STREET, GUDIVADA - S/ONOT MENTION. HINDU OCC: r,L.N0.15/32-4, park ROAD. 521 301. KRISHNA DISTRICT. LEELA PRASAD, broker business STREET, GUDIVADA - 3.GURRALA PAWAN GANGAMMA J.C.J.C. GUDIVADA. 4.KAGITHYA SALMON RAJU, S/O.NOT MENTION, HINDU OCC: ELECTRICAL MOTOR MECHANIC R/O.D.NO. 15/32-4, PARK ROAD GANGAMMA STREET, GUDIVADA - 521 301, KRISHNA DISTRICT J.C.J.C. GUDIVADA. 5.ZILANI, S/O.NOT MENTION, MUSLIM OCC: r. TAILORING R/O.D.NO.15/32-4, PARK ROAD, GANGAMMA STREET GUDIVADA - 521 301, KRISHNA DISTRICT. J.C.J.C. GUDIVADA. 6.JUPUDI KAMALA KUMARI, W/0. LATE SIVA PRASAD HINDU AGED 58 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE. SATYANARAYANAPURAM, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7.THATAVARTHI MANINAGALAKSHMIKUMARI, W/0. SURENDRA KUMAR, HINDU, AGED 32 YEARS,R/0. LAKSHMI NARASIMHA TRADERS, M.G.C COMPLEX, SHOP NO.240, GOLLAPUDI KRISHNA DISTRICT. R/0. D.NO.16-140 RESPONDENT NOS. 6 AND 7 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS L. OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO. 1 VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 24.01.2025 IN I.A.N0.1 OF 2021 IN A.S.N0.236 OF 2013. LRS ...RESPONDENT(S): THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMFMT- The Appeal Suit is preferred by the appellants against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.01.2013, passed in O.S.No.41 of 2010 learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna at Gudivada. on the file of the 2. Learned counsel appearing on both sides are present. Appellant Nos.1, 2 and 3 and respondent Nos.6 and 7 are present in person. It is submitted that respondent Nos.2 to 5 are not necessary parties as they are tenants and they already vacated the property. € for hearing, both parties in the identified by their learned counsel. The terms Today, when the matter is taken up appeal are present and they are and conditions of compromise are read over to the parties and they are 3. of the said compromise made, a of Rs.4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only) has admitted as true and correct. In pursuance cheque bearing No.000037 been given to the appellants by the respondents. satisfied with the terms and conditions of compromise and in amicable settlement made by both parties, the appeal is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shali stand 4. On being view of the closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR te //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gudivada, Krishna District (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri. NarasimhaRao Gudiseva,Advocate[OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. B V Anjaneyulu, Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 5. Three CD Copies sree *along with Joint memo filed in I.A No.1 of 2025 HIGH COURT DATED;06/02/2025 JUDGMENT + COMPROMISE DECREE AS.No.236 of 2013 an h \ 3 MAR 2C25 | Current Section . ^ DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI A.S.No. 236 OF 2013 Between: 1 Jupudi Satyanaray 3. S/o.iate Radha Venakta Krishnayya Aged about 64 years, Occ; Business, R/o. D.No.8/203-1, Gowrisankarapuram, Gudivada, Krishna District. 2. Jupudi Hema Krishna Prasad, S/o. Satyanarayana Aged about 40 years, R/o. D.No.8/203-1 Gowrisankarapuram, Gudivada, Krishna District. 3. Jupudi Phaneendra, S/o. Satyanaraya Aged about 38 years, R/o. D,No.8/203-1 Gowrisankarapuram, Gudivada; Krishna District. W: t na APPELLANTS And: 1. Jupudi Siva Prasad (Died) 2. Kanigalapula Venkata Subba Rao, S/o. Venkateswarlu Aged about 65 years, Occ: Business, R/o. D.No.15/32-4, Park Road, Gulabchand Petrol Bunk, Gangamma Street Gudivada, Krishna District. 3. Gurrala Leela Prasad, S/o. Not Mentioned. Aged about 55 years, Occ: Pawn Broker Business, R/o. D.No.t5/32-4 Park Road, Gulabchand Petrol Bunk, Gangamma Street, Gudivada, Krishna District. 4. Kagitha Salmon Raju, S/o. Not Mentioned, Aged about 52 years, Occ: Electrical Motor Mechanic, R/o. D.No.15/32-4 Park Road. Gulabchand Petrol Bunk, Gangamma Street, Gudivada, Krishna District. 5. Zilani, S/o. Not Mentioned, Aged about 72 years, Occ: Tailoring, R/o. D.No.15/32-4, Park Road, Gulabchand Petrol Bunk, Gangamma Street, Gudivada, Krishna District. 6. Jupudi Kamala Kumari, W/o. late Siva Prasad, Aged about 61 years. House wife, R/o. D.No.16-140, Satyanarayanapuram, Gudivada, Krishna District. I: ■f I s V ' M'aJ i- in ^ -10 7. Thatavarthi Mani Naga Lakshmi Kumari, W/o. Surendra Kumar, Aged about 35 years, R/o. Lakshmi Narasimha Traders, M.G.C Complex, Shop No.240, Gollapudi, Krishna District. RESPONDENTSx (Respondent Nos.2 to 5 are not necessary parties.) MEMORANDUM OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF COMPROMISE 1. That Appellants 1 to 3 and Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have compromised the First appeal with the below mentioned terms and conditions. 1^‘ Respondent / 1®' Defendant died and his legal representatives were brought on record as Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. The Appellants and Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have prepared a sketch which includes Item Nos. 1,2 and 3 of Plaint Schedule Property. That Both the Appellants and Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have agreed that there are 2 shops on Southern side abutting road and there is a 4 feet width pathway in between 2 shops from South to No.dh. On the back of the said two 2 shops there are 4 shops which are covered under Items 2 and 3 of Plaint Schedule Property. Apart from that there is a house on upper floor of Item No.1 to 3 i.e., where Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 are residing. There are steps to reach 1®' Floor on South-east corner, to give more brevity, a sketch was prepared for easy understanding. In the rough sketch, 2 shops are shown as 1. ABCD shop situated on South west and another shop EFGH on south east in between there is 'CBEH' pathway to reach Northern shops. The elders have compromised the matter in between the Appellant Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 2. i I Nos.1 to 3 and That Appellants and Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have agreed that Appellants have to hold ABCD and as EFGH (2 shops) with absolute rights for which Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have no objection. A. / \ 00 A Vi'- 1 I s -^/i- The Appellant Nos. 1 to 3 have also agreed to keep ‘CBEH’ Pathway for the benefit of Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 and Appellants have no objection r; B. / exclusive and claim in respect of upstairs over Item No.1 of Plaint Schedule Property used by respondents 6 and 7 as an exclusive owners. It is further agreed that the AppeHants will not claim any share in respect of Item No. 2 or 3 Plaint Schedule Property as like upstairs house situated over and above Item No.1 Schedule Property and they will not interfere with the exclusive use of Plaint of stair case of Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 to reach upstairs. Appellant Nos. 1 to 3 and Respondent Nos.6 and 7 who are legal heirs of Respondent No.1/ Defendant No.1 i.e., elder brother of 1®‘ Appellant will object the enjoyment of Item 1 (2 shops) of the Plaint Schedule Property ‘ABCD’ and ‘EFGH’ C. The not which are clearly mentioned in the annexure sketch as 2 shops. It is further submitted that the Pathway mentioned as CBEH is Defendant Nos. 6 and 7/ Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 decided to use by exclusively and absolutely and the appellants shall not claim any right over ‘CBEH’ pathway. The Appellants/Plaintiffs are hereby agreed that they will not claim any right the back side of said 2 shops (ABCD and EFGH) as well as mesne profits. D. on For which the Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 are hereby agreed to pay an amount towards full and final settlement of First Appeal claim in of Rs.8,00.000/- A.S.Nos.236/2013 and 796/2013 to the 1"‘ Appellant (Jupudi Satyanarayana). Out of Rs.8,00.000/- today an amount of Rs.4.00,000/- was paid by way of HDFC Bank. In the name Cheque No.^^^?Dt. ^^-12-2024 drawn 1®‘ Appellant /1®^ Plaintiff which is to be presented for collection immediately after recording the compromise, and Respondent Nos.6 and 7 have agreed to pay Rs.4,00,000/- on Compromise Decree. on the date of Registration of partition deed in terms of I I It is relevant to mention that there are 3 shops abutting to park road on Western side on South-West corner shop belongs to the Appellants as like I E. V V^\ W -L-ji^JiArvojTf other 2 shops are belonged to Respondent Nos. 6 and 7/Defendant Nos. and 7. The said 3 shops are on western side, which are not part of thr:^laint^ Schedule Property and there is no dispute to the said 3 shops situated on western side as well as two (2) shops of Respondent Nos. 6 and 7. F. The Respondent Nos.6 and 7 shall not interfere with the possession and enjoyment of Item No.1 ( 2 shops ABCD and EFGH Shops ). The appellants shall not interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the rest of the property including the up stair residential house and the steps. G. In view of the compromise in this appeal, the appeal in A.S.No.796 / 2013, and C.R.P.No. 1262/2022 are to be closed by recording the compromise terms of this appeal. H. The respondents 6 and 7, being the legal heirs of the deceased 1®' respondent are entitled to take the original title deeds Ex:B5 and B6 back marked in O.S. No.41/2010 on the file of XI Addl. District Judge, Gudiwada. The respondents 6 and 7 have to hand over the Ex: B5 sale deed Doc. bearing No.89/1987 S.R.O. Gudiwada to the 1"‘ appellant. I. Both parties agreed to execute and register the partition deed in terms of the compromise decree and do bear the expenses equally for registration of the partition deed. The terms and conditions are all binding on both the parties and their legal heirs and successors. <*9? 6'^ RESPONDENT "Tx VI 'A/ I' „ 7‘^ RESPONDENT 1®‘APPELLANT 1 2™ APPELLANT 3^'‘ APPELLANT S I COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS AMARAVATHI, DATED: ^0-12-2024. Jk IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE '§ oo PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 236 OF 2013 Between: 1. Jupudi Satyanarayana, S/o.late Radha Venakta Krishnayya, Hindu, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Business R/o.D.No.8/203-1, Gowrisankarapuram, Gudivada, Krishna District, J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 2. Jupudi Hema Krishna Prasad, S/o.Satyanarayana, Hindu, Aged about 28 years, Occ: Student R/o.D.No.8/203-1, Gowrisankarapuram, Gudivada, Krishna District, J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 3. Jupudi Phaneendra, S/o.Satyanarayana, Hindu, Aged about 27 years, Occ; Student R/o.D.No.8/2003-1, Gowrisankarapuram, Gudivada, Krishna District, J.C.J.C. Gudivada. ...Appellants/Plaintiffs AND 1. Jupudi Siva Prasad, S/o.Late Radha, (Died per LRs 6 and 7) 2. Kanigalapula Venkata Subba Rao, S/o.Venkateswarlu, Hindu Occ: Business R/o.D.No.15/32-4, Park Road, Gangamma Street, Gudivada - 521 301, Krishna District. J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 3. Gurrala Leela Prasad, S/o.Not Mention, Hindu Occ: Pawan Broker Business R/o.D.No.15/32-4, Park Road, Gangamma Street, Gudivada - 521 301, Krishna District. J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 4. Kagithya Salmon Raju, S/o. Not Mention, Hindu Occ: Electrical Motor Mechanic R/o.D.No. 15/32-4, Park Road, Gangamma Street, Gudivada - 521 301, Krishna District. J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 5. Zilani, S/o.Not Mention, Muslim Occ; Tailoring R/o.D.No. 15/32-4, Park Road, Gangamma Street, Gudivada - 521 301, Krishna District. J.C.J.C. Gudivada. 6. Jupudi Kamala Kumari, W/o. late Siva Prasad, Hindu, Aged 58 House Wife, R/o. D.No. 16-140, Satyanarayanapuram Krishna District. years, Gudivada, 7. Thatavarthi Maninagalakshmikumari, W/o. Surendra Kumar, Hindu Aged 32 years, R/o. Lakshmi narasimha Traders, M.G.C Complex Shop No.240, Gollapudi, Krishna District. (Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 are brought on record as LRs of deceased respondent no. 1 vide Court order dated 24.01.2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in A.S.No.236 of 2013). ...Respondents Appeal under Section 96 of C.P.C, aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 29-01-2013 passed in O.S No. 41 of 2010 on the file of the XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Krishna District at Gudivada. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the Memorandum of Terms and Conditions of Compromise entered in between the Appellant Nos. 1 to 3 and Respondents 6 & 7, accordingly pass the Decree in A.S.No.236 of 2013 by making the said Memorandum of Terms and Conditions of Compromise well as Sketch as part of the Decree. as The appeal suit and I.A.No.1 of 2025 coming this day for order as to settlement in the presence of Sri Narasimha Guidseva, Advocate for the Appellants and of Sri B V Anjaneyulu, Advocate for respondent Nos. 6 & 7. Appellant and the Respondents through respective advocate having filed I.A.No.1 of 2025 requesting the court to pass decree in terms of Memorandum of Compromise entered into between them and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, Judgment and decree of the Trial Court and the Joint Memorandum of Compromise purporting to have been signed by the parties and their advocates and filed with the said I.A.No.1 of 2025, it is appearing from the said Memorandum of compromise that the parties herein have entered into compromise and settled the matter in terms of compromise filed in I.A.No.1 of 2025. This Court DOTH RECORD the terms of the said Joint Memorandum of Compromise the original where is filed in the record of the said I.A.No.1 of 2025 and a copy whereof is annexed hereto and Doth in terms of the said Memorandum of Compromise, order and decree as follows: 1. That the appeal be and is hereby disposed of; That the terms and conditions of the compromise enetered into between parties herein as follows: That the Appellants 1 to 3 and Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have compromised the First appeal with the below mentioned terms and conditions. 1 2. I. Respondent/1 Defendant died and his legal representatives were brought on record as Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. That the Appellants and Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have prepared a sketch which includes Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3 of Plaint Schedule Property. That both the Appellants and Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have agreed that there are 2 shops on Southern side abutting road and there is a 4 feet width pathway in between 2 shops from South to North. On the back of the said two 2 shops there are 4 shops which are covered under Items 2 and 3 of Plaint Schedule Property. Apart from that there is a house upper floor of Item No.1 to 3 i.e., where Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 are on residing. There are steps to reach 1st Floor on South-east corner, to give more brevity, a sketch was prepared for easy understanding. In the rough sketch, 2 shops are shown as 1. ABCD shop situated on South west and another shop EFGH on south-east in between there is 'CBEH' pathway to reach Northern shops. The elders have compromised the matter in between the Appellant Nos. 1 to 3 and Respondent Nos. 6 & 7. A. That Appellants and Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have agreed that Appellants have to hold ABCD and as EFGH (2 shops) with absolute rights for which Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 have no objection B. That the Appellant Nos. 1 to 3 have also agreed to keep CBEH Pathway for the exclusive benefit of Respondent Nos. 6 & 7 and Appellants have no objection and claim in respect of upstairs over Item No.1 of Plaint Schedule Property used by respondents 6 and 7 as an exclusive owners. It is further agreed that the Appellants will not claim any share in respect of Item No. 2 or 3 Plaint Schedule Property as like upstairs house situated over and above Item No.1 of Plaint Schedule Property and they will not interfere with the exclusive use of stair case of Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 to reach upstairs. C. That the Appellant Nos. 1 to 3 and Respondent Nos.6 and 7 who are ’ legal heirs of Respondent No.1/ Defendant No.1 i.e., elder brother of 1st Appellant will not object the enjoyment of Item 1 (2 shops) of the Plaint Schedule Property which are clearly mentioned in the annexure sketch as 'ABCD' and 'EFGH 2 shops. It is further submitted that the Pathway mentioned as 'CBEH' is decided to use by Defendant Nos. 6 and 71 Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 exclusively and absolutely and the appellants shall not claim any right over 'CBEH' pathway. D. That the Appellants/Plaintiffs are hereby agreed that they will not claim any right on the back side of said 2 shops (ABCD and EFGH) as well as mesne profits. For which the Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 are hereby agreed to pay an amount of Rs.8,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of First Appeal claim in A.S.Nos.236/2013 and 796/2013 to the 1st Appellant (Jupudi Satyanarayana). Out of Rs.8,00,000/- today an amount of Rs.4,00,000/- was paid by way of Cheque No.000037 Dt. 22-12-2024 drawn on HDFC Bank. In the name 1st Appellant /1st Plaintiff which is to be presented for collection immediately after recording the compromise, and Respondent Nos.6 and 7 have agreed to pay Rs.4,00,000/- on the date of Registration of partition deed in terms of Compromise Decree. E. That it is relevant to mention that there are 3 shops abutting to park road on Western side on South-West corner shop belongs to the Appellants as like other 2 shops are belonged to Respondent Nos. 6 and 7/Defendant Nos e and 7. The said 3 shops are on Western side which are not part of the Plain Schedule Property and there is no dispute to the said 3 shops situated on western side as well as two (2) shops of Respondent Nos. 6 and 7. F. That the Respondent Nos.6 and 7 shall not interfere with the possession and enjoyment of Item No.1 (2 shops ABCD and EFGH Shops). The appellants shall not interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the rest of the property including the up stair residential house and the steps. G. That In view of the compromise in this appeal, the appeal in A.S.No.796/2013, and C.R.P.No.1262/2022 are to be closed by recording the compromise terms of this appeal. H. That the respondents 6 and 7, being the legal heirs of the deceased 1 respondent are entitled to take the original title deeds Ex:B5 and B6 back marked in O.S. No. 41/2010 on the file of XI Addl. District Judge, Gudiwada. The respondents 6 and 7 have to hand over the Ex: B5 sale deed Doc bearing No.89/1987 S.R.O. Gudiwada to the 1®‘ appellant. I. That the both parties agreed to execute and register the partition deed in terms of the compromise decree and do bear the expenses equally for registration of the partition deed. That the terms and conditions are all binding on both the parties and their legal heirs and successors. That there be no order as to costs in this appeal. J. 3. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To. 1. The XI Additional District & Sessions Judge, Gudivada, Krishna District. Three CD Copies 2. sree HIGH COURT DATED:06/02/2025 COMPROMISE DECREE AS.No.236 of 2013 .X 13 MAR 2025 ^ Current Section DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL SUIT WITHOUT COSTS