APHC010198072015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 22588 Between: The Sri Sai Harijana Mahila Labour Contract Co The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAUSHIK KUMBHAJADALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 22588 OF 2015 The Sri Sai Harijana Mahila Labour Contract Co-op Society AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: KAUSHIK KUMBHAJADALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 22588 OF 2015 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.2 herein in issuing the Short Tender Notification dt 14.07.2015 bearing Roc.No. 379/2015/E1 for third time without assigning any reason without cancelling the previous two Short Tender Notices bearing Roc No.379/2015/E1 dt 10.04.2015 and 20.03.2015 as being illegal, arbitrary, unilateral, unconstitutional and consequently set aside the tender notification dt. 14.07.2015 and to finalize the second tender notification bearing Roc.No. 379/2015/E1 dt 10.04.2015 and pass such other orders....” 2. As the tender pertains to the year of 2015, in view of passage of time and changed circumstances, the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 21.03.2025 KK