Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 155013 (ALL)

GUDDU @ ISMAIL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

A482/5222/2015 · 2025-04-17

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21608 Court No. - 19 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5222 of 2015 Applicant :- Guddu @ Ismail Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Misra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Vinod Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The applicant by means of present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has assailed the order dated 14.10.2015 by which the trial court has rejected the application of the applicant under Section 210 Cr.P.C. on the ground that the Case Crime No.140 of 2011, Case No.57 of 2013, under Sections 376, 504, 506 IPC, Police Chappiya, District Gonda against Saddam @ Suddu is tried by Juvenile Justice Board whereas the other case namely, Sessions Trial No.264 of 2014 is being tried by the court of Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C. cannot be clubbed together. 3. Challenging the aforesaid order, learned counsel for the applicant has contended that as per version of FIR, the offence was committed only by one accused and one Suddu has been convicted by the Juvenile Justice Board and therefore for the same offence, the applicant cannot be convicted, therefore it is a case for quashing of FIR. 4. Be that as it may, in the instant case the applicant has assailed the order rejecting the application under Section 210 Cr.P.C. of the applicant. The relevant extract of which is reproduced hereinbelow:- उपररोक्त दरोननों वविधधि व्यविस्थथाओओं कथा ससम्मथान अविलरोकन वकयथा गयथा। उपररोक्त वविधधि व्यविस्थथाओओं कके तथ्य वभिन्न हह। वितरमथान प्रकरण मम पपुधलस ररपरोरर मम जहथाहाँ एक अन्य व्यवक्त नथामथाओंवकत हरोतथा हह, जरो वकशरोर ककी शकेणणी मम आनके कके कथारण धजसकथा वविचथारण वकशरोर न्यथाय बरोरर कके अन्तगरत हरो रहथा हह। पररविथाद मम पणीवरतथा दथारथा धजस व्यवक्त कके वविरूद पररविथाद दथाधखिल वकयथा गयथा हह, विह वियस्क ककी शकेणणी मम आतथा हह। अतहवि दरोननों अपरथाधि एक हणी हरोनके कके उपरथान्त भिणी वकशरोर अधधिवनयम कके प्रथाविधिथान कके अन्तगरत वकशरोर करो वविचथाररत करनके कथा ककेतथाधधिकथार वकशरोर न्यथाय बरोरर कथा हरोगथा। अततः प्रथाथर्थी दथारथा यथावचत ककी गयणी यथाचनथा स्विणीकथार वकयके जथानके यरोग्य नहहीं हह। तद्नपुसथार प्रथाथरनथा -पत वनरस्त वकयके जथानके यरोग्य हह। 5. This Court finds that the reason assigned by the court below in rejecting the application under Section 210 Cr.P.C is based upon the correct appreciation of law and does not call for any interference by this Court in exercise of its extraordinary power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 6. Consequently, the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. Order Date :- 17.4.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench