IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.416 of 2024 Decided on: 03.04.2025 Surender Mehta ...Petitioner Versus Priyanka ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge Whether approved for reporting? . For the petitioner: Mr. Romesh Verma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Shakti Bhardwaj, Advocate. Satyen Vaidya, Judge The parties are present in person along with their respective counsel. 2. The parties have settled their dispute and terms of the compromise have been recorded on 1st April, 2025 by learned Mediator in the mediation proceedings. The joint statement of the parties has been recorded today and both of them have acknowledged the factum of having entered into a compromise. They have also acknowledged the correctness of the contents of the deed of compromise recorded in mediation proceedings on 01.04.2025. 2 3. In view of development that has taken place, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of. 4. It has been pointed out that in the compromise deed recorded during the mediation proceedings, the title of the case has been wrongly written as Cr.MMO No.416 of 2024, whereas it should have been CMPMO No.416 of 2024. The mistake is inadvertent and insignificant. The title shall be read as CMPMO No.416 of 2024 for all intents and purposes. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 3rd April, 2025 (vt)