2025:JHHC:19582 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S) No. 3111 of 2025 ---- LALJI GANJHU, son of late Kapileshwar Ganjhu, aged about 36 years, resident of Village Kotogada, P.O. Pirgul & P.S. Kasmar, District Bokaro, Jharkhand…..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. The Secretary, Department of Education, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 4. The Regional Joint Director of Education, District North Chotanagpur Division P.O & P.S Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh. 5. The Deputy Commissioner Ramgarh-cum- Chairman, District Compassionate Appointment Committee, Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh 6. The Deputy Commissioner Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro, District Bokaro 7. The Establishment Deputy Collector, Ramgarh, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh. …Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner : Ms. Rinku Bhakat, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Sweta Shukla, AC to AAG-II -- 02/14.07.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The writ petition has been preferred by the Petitioner for the following reliefs: a) For a direction upon the respondent No. 5&6 i.e., Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro to consider the representation of the petitioner for modification of Class IV Post to Class III Post, as similar other persons holding Matric and have been appointed in Class III post, wherein the respondent No. 6 considered their case and granted them Class-III post. b) For a further direction upon the respondents to pay all consequential benefits to the petitioner, after adjustment/ modification in Class III Post, which are vacant and also pay the scale of clerk/ class III post as the petitioner was work as class III since his appointment working as a clerk. 2025:JHHC:19582 2 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that though the Petitioner had filed several representations before the Respondent, but his representations have not been considered till date; as such, the concerned Respondent may be directed to take a decision on the representations filed by the Petitioner. 4. Ld. counsel for the Respondents submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed and it is the first date of hearing; as such, the Petitioner may be directed to file a fresh representation before the 4th Respondent. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts of the case, this writ petition is hereby disposed of by directing the 4th Respondent to treat this writ application as representation and take a decision in the matter after consulting the Respondent nos. 5, 6 & 7 with regard to claim made by the Petitioner in accordance with law and applicable Rules and Regulations by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 16 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this writ petition along with its order to the 4th Respondent for early disposal of his claim. 6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of in the manner indicated hereinabove. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Jk