HRITIK AWASTHI @ RITIK AWASTHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. GOVT. LKO.
NA528/875/2025 · 2025-08-01
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154989 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154989 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44894 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 875 of 2025 Applicant :- Hritik Awasthi @ Ritik Awasthi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Govt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sharad Yadav,Amit Bhardwaj,Satish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Sharad Yadav, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in six cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each case, details of which are as follows- (i) Case Crime No.15/2025 u/S 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 120B, IPC, Police Station- Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow. (ii) Case Crime No.542/2024 u/S 316(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 351(3), B.N.S., Police Station- Gomti Nagar, District- Lucknow. (iii) Case Crime No.262/2023 u/S 406, 504, 506, Police Station- Chinhat, District- Lucknow. (iv.) Case Crime no. 188 / 2023, U/S - 406 of I.P.C., P.S. - Chinhat, District - Lucknow. (v.) Case Crime no. 267/2023, U/S-406, 420, 504, 506 of I.P.C., P.S.-Aliganj, District-Lucknow. (vi.) Case Crime no. 1524 / 2019, U/S - 452, 354 Kha, 384, 504, 506 of I.P.C., P.S. - Gomtinagar, District - Lucknow. 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble
Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5.
Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties, each of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in other five cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 1.8.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench