RAM AUTAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/7420/2025 · 2025-08-04
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45047-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7420 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Autar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Srivastava,Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties specially opposite party no. 3 to demarcate the land of the petitioner as per order dated 18.4.2025 passed by the opposite party no. 3."
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner had preferred an application for demarcation of his land and, as per
order dated 10.04.2015, a direction was issued in this regard for demarcation. The respondent no.4 filed a Revision against such order, which Revision has also been decided in favour of the petitioner, yet no Patharnasab/ erection of pillars has been done till date. Hence this petition has been filed.
4. Learned Standing Counsel has produced before this Court instructions dated 28.07.2025 sent by Sub Divisional Magistrate Sawayajpur, Hardoi, wherein it has been stated that on the application made by the petitioner on 30.05.2025, a team of revenue officials was constituted and they tried to erect boundary marks on Gata No.50. In the revenue records, the area of Gata no.50 is shown as 0.9420 hectare, and on the map the area is shown as 1.0400 hec. There is a dispute regarding the area shown in the map and an application for correction of map has also been entertained in this regard. The neighbouring tenure holders have
raised a dispute that till the decision on the application for correction of map, no demarcation of area 1.0400 hectare, as mentioned in the map, should be done. The demarcation should be done only of 0.9420 hectare, as shown in the khatauni. The Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue) is seized of the matter regarding application for correction of map. As and when such application for correction of map is decided, the erection of boundary pillars will be done.
5. Instructions are kept on record.
6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Rahul Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench