Dr.Praveen Choppara, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal
WP/23885/2016 · 2025-09-03
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15495 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15495 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010198462016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 23885/2016 Between:
1. DR.PRAVEEN CHOPPARA,, S/O RAJA RAO, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O. H.NO.20-28-9/B, STATION ROAD, CHINNARAVURU VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT OF A.P., SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, B.R.K. BHAVAN 5TH FLOOR, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD.
3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, WOMENS COLLEGE CAMPUS, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
ANDHRA PRADESH.
4. THE SECRETARY CORRESPONDENT VSR NVR COLLEGE, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J M NAIDU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PAVAN KUMAR ANNABATHUNI
2. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri M.Naga Kishore, learned counsel representing Sri J.M.Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication.
2. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 04.09.2025 Ivd
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.23885 of 2016
Date: 04.09.2025
Ivd