MANDRESH RAJBHAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/6958/2025 · 2025-08-01
Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154943 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154943 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44783-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6958 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mandresh Rajbhar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anita Srivastava,Vinod Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) as well as learned A.G.A., who appears for the State-respondents as well as Shri Satyam Tiwari, who has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.3 by filing his 'vakalatnama' and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner(s) with following main prayer(s):
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned First Information Report lodged by the opposite party no.3 against the petitioners on the basis of false and fabricated facts on 10.06.2025 at Case Crime No. 438 of 2025, under section 137(2), 351(3) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, Police Station Akbarpur, district Ambedkar Nagar, contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ petition; and ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties no.1 to 3 not to take any action against the petitioners in connection to the impugned First Information Report lodged by the opposite party no.3 at Case Crime No. 438 of 2025, under section 137(2), 351(3) Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, Police Station Akbarpur, district Ambedkar Nagar, contained in Annexure No.1 to this writ
petition; "
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner(s) that the victim was in love with the petitioner no.1 and wished to marry him, but respondent no.3 refused to solemnized such marriage and lodged the impugned F.I.R.
4. It has also been submitted that now an amicable settlement has arrived between the parties and the original compromise has been filed as Annexure no.3 to the writ petition. 5. Learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court instructions sent by Shri Mahendra Saroj, Sub Inspector/Investigating Officer, Police Station Akbarpur, District Ambedkar Nagar, wherein it has been stated that Final Report No.119/2025 dated 05.07.2025 has been prepared. The Instructions are taken on record. 6. In view of the above facts, it appears that instant writ petition has become infructuous. 7. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. .
(Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 1.8.2025 Anupam S/- Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench