Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15490 (UTT)

DR. HARISH SINGH BOHRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/194/2017 · 2025-08-20

Alok Mahra, Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 03 WPSB No.194 of 2017 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Gaurav Paliwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.N. Joshi, D.A.G. for the State. The instant petition was dismissed in non-prosecution on 20.08.2025. Now, Restoration Application, MCC No.5915 of 2025, has been filed along with Delay Condonation Application, IA No.5916 of 2025. It is delayed by 24 days. Heard on delay condonation application. It is not objected to by learned State Counsel. Having considered the grounds for delay, the delay condonation application is allowed. The delay in preferring the restoration application is condoned. Heard on Restoration Application. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on the date of hearing, the petitioner as well as his counsel could not appear in the Court. The mistake is bona fide and unintentional. Having considered, this Court is of the view that the petitioner has been able to show sufficient grounds for his non- appearance on the date of hearing. The restoration application is allowed. Let the writ petition be restored to its original number. List this matter on 30.12.2025, for hearing. (Alok Mahra J.) (Ravindra Maithani J.) 12.11.2025 RV