Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154897 (ALL)

VIVEK MEHROTRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/817/2025 · 2025-07-30

Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 817 of 2025 Revisionist :- Vivek Mehrotra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- J.B. Singh,Vineet Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Heard Shri J. B. Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the order dated 10.06.2025 passed in Criminal Case No. 330 of 2023, Smt. Sonal Mehrotra vs. Vivek Mehrotra, under Section 125 CrPC by Additional Principal Judge, Court No. 5, Family Court, Lucknow has been assailed solely on the ground that the amount of maintenance paid to the revisionist prior to the passing of the aforesaid order disclosed in the objection has not been adjusted and since the arrears are huge, therefore, installment may be fixed. Learned AGA submits that in regard to the aforesaid request, the revisionist may move an application before the concerned court, who may consider the same. In view of above, without entering into the merits of the case, the revision is disposed of with liberty to the revisionist to move appropriate application before the concerned court disclosing the payment made to the respondent no. 2 towards maintenance, if any, and for adjustment thereof in the arrears and for installments and the concerned court may consider his application in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties expeditiously, in case it is moved within two weeks from today. Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Raj Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench