APHC010198172002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17803/2002 Between: 1. N.MUNIRATHNAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT., S/O. MUNI KRISHNAIAH, MANAGING DIRECTOR, TIRUPATI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., TIRUPATI R/O. KUMMARATHOPU, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TIRUPATI COOPERATIVE BANK LTD CHAIRMAN TIRUPATHI, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, MAIN OFFICER, 23, TIRUPATI. 2. M REDDY RAJANNA, RETIRED ANDHRA BANK OFFICER, NEAR LITTLE ANGELS SCHOOL, YASHODA NAGAR, TIRUPATI, 3. THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 4. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICER, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue anf appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus: declaring the order dated 6-9-2002 of the Respondent No.1 as arbitrary, illegal, violative of article 14, 16, 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same; and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 22362 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the Respondent No.1, dated 6-9-2002, during the Pendency of the Writ Petition, otherwise the Petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and injury and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 2945 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the Interim Orders granted in W.P.M.P.No. 22362 of 2002 in W.P.No. 17803 of 2002, dated 16-9-2002, and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY 2. madhusudan reddy Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE 2. GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.07.2025 and 24.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 21st August, 2025 RKS