Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154884 (ALL)

SANJAY KUMAR v. COMMISSIONER, DIVISION, LUCKNOW AND 4 OTHERS

/4572/2025 · 2025-08-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45140 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4572 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Respondent :- Commissioner, Division, Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pravin Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Pravin Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the application for interim relief filed by the petitioner with appeal bearing Case No. 4585/2024 (Computerized Case No. C202410000004854) (Sanjay Kuamr and others Vs. Godhan and others) and further prayed for expeditious disposal of appeal bearing Case No. 4585/2024 (Computerized Case No. C202410000004854) (Sanjay Kuamr and others Vs. Godhan and others) U/S 331 (3) of U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reform Act, 1950. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction respondent No. 1 to consider the application for interim relief filed by the petitioner with appeal bearing Case No. 4585/2024 (Computerized Case No. C202410000004854)(Sanjay Kuamr and others Vs. Godhan and others) in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 1 - Commissioner, Lucknow Division, Lucknow to consider and decide application for interim relief filed by the petitioner with appeal bearing Case No. 4585/2024 (Computerized Case No. C202410000004854) (Sanjay Kuamr and others Vs. Godhan and others) within a period of three weeks from the date sufficiency of service is received with regard to the respondents and in case there is no legal impediment. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench