Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15488 (UTT)

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND v. AJAY KUMAR

WPSB/342/2021 · 2025-04-30

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSB 342/2021 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. G.S. Negi, Additional CSC, for the State/petitioners. Mr. Trilok Chandra, Advocate, i/b Mr. K.K. Joshi, Advocate for the respondent /review applicant. (2) For the reasons indicated, delay condonation application (IA/5/2025) is allowed. Delay in filing the review application is condoned. (3) State filed this writ petition challenging the judgment rendered by the Public Services Tribunal. Writ petition was allowed vide judgment dated 30.4.2025 on the ground that respondent was not eligible for notional promotion, as minor punishment was imposed upon him. (4) Today, the matter is listed on review application (MCC/4/2025). Some new documents have been brought on record for seeking review of the aforesaid judgment. Law is well settled that review is not to be treated as an appeal in disguise. Learned Counsel for the petitioners could not show any error apparent on the face of record, which may warrant invocation of review jurisdiction. Accordingly, review application is rejected. (Ashish Naithani, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 18.12.2025 Pr