ADHIR SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/6899/2025 · 2025-07-31
Brij Raj Singh, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154876 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154876 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44585-DB Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6899 of 2025 Petitioner :- Adhir Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Kumar Agnihotri Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard Sri Manish Kumar Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. appears for the State.
2. By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-
"i.. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS be issued commanding the opp. Party No. 2 to restrain the opp. party No. 3 not to harass and torture to the petitioner without any rhyme and reason and not to disturb the peaceful life of the
petitioner. ii.. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS be issued commanding the opp. parties No. 2 to take appropriate and strict action against the local police of police Station pasgawan District Kheri who has started harassment of the petitioner without any rhyme and reason only intent to take the money from the petitioner.
3. Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A., on the basis of written instruction, has informed that since the present petitioner is having history sheet, therefore, so as to know his location the police authorities are duty bound to approach him on his residence and that exercise is undertaken strictly in accordance with law. Therefore, as per Sri Pandey the police authorities are not harassing the petitioner in any manner whatsoever.
4. Having considered the aforesaid submission of Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A., nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition accordingly the same is dismissed, however, it is needless to say that no person may be harassed without any cogent reason to that effect. . . [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 31.7.2025 Anuj Singh Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench