Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45983-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7397 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramesh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Janak Yadav,Ambrish Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well Sri S.B.Pandey, learned D.S.G.I. and Sri Mohan Singh, who appears on behalf of respondent No.6 and Learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1,3 and 4. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following relief(s): "i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandmaus thereby direct the opposite parties to inquire the matter that the Adhar Card bearing its No- 903991050038 was initially issued to whom and when it was corrected to the name of whom and when it Chhakkan, upon whose application/ recommendation, and decide the dispute of the property regarding Gata No-878 Dha/5.0590 Hec. situated in Village Para, Pergana-Badosarai, Tehsil- Sirauli Gauspur, District- Barabanki in accordance with law, in the interest of justice." 3. It is the case of the petitioner that Opposite party No.5 i.e. one Chhakan had come to this court, praying for a direction to the respondents to correct the record. The petitioner was not arrayed as a party. The Court directed the authorities to look into the matter and, if the rights of any third party, which is being affected, it shall also be considered, and then the application for correction of record shall be decided. 4. The petitioner on coming to know of imposter claiming himself to be Chhakan, filed an application before respondent No.2 for getting verified the Aadhar Card of the respondent No.5. The respondent No. 2 has not yet decided the application; hence, this petition has been filed. 5. The learned DSGI says that the petitioner's application has been entertained, and notice has been issued to respondent No. 5. A copy of the instructions dated 01.08.2025, sent to the Assisting Counsel, Sri Varun Pandey, has been placed before this court. The instruction are taken on the record. 6. The writ petition is disposed of, without entering into the merits of the controversy, with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the claim/inquiry made by the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced to him. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Order Date :- 7.8.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench