KRIPALI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. OF REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A227/4539/2025 · 2025-07-30
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154846 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154846 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44062 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4539 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kripali Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Of Revenue Deptt., Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uttam Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of respondents no.1 and Shri Pankaj Gupta, who has accepted notice on behalf of Gram Sabha- respondent no.3. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to respondent no. 4 is dispensed with. 3. Present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner with the prayer to issue a direction to the respondent no.2 to decide the case filed by Heerawati Devi against the petitioner under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 bearing Suit No. 763/2025 Computerized Case No. C20250257040763 Heerawati Devi Vs. Kripali Devi pending before the Sub- District Magistrate, Pratapgarh. 4. It has been submitted that the private respondent has filed partition suit before the Sub District Magistrate, Pratapgarh under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, bearing Suit No. 763/2025 Computerized Case No. C20250257040763 Heerawati Devi Vs. Kripali Devi. It has been stated that the matter is urgent and a perusal of the order sheet clearly indicates that though the case is regularly listed but it is routinely adjourned on one pretext or the other. 5. It is noticed that the instant matter relates to 2025 and the trial courts are heavily burdened with the dockets due to which large number of cases are pending before them. In the present case, no extraordinary circumstance has been indicated by the petitioner so as to interfere and pass orders for expeditious disposal of the revision which has been filed only in 2024. Accordingly, no case for interference is made out at this stage. 6. However, looking to the aforesaid circumstances, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate application before
the trial court within next two weeks for expediting the proceedings. In case, such an application is made, the trail court shall consider and decide the same within two weeks thereafter by a reasoned and speaking order.
In case, the trial court finds that a case for urgency has been made out, it shall proceed to consider and decide the case of the petitioner expeditiously. 7. With aforesaid direction the petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench