Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15483 (KAR)

DURGAPPA v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

WP/2563/2023 · 2025-03-04

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9245 WP No. 2563 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 2563 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: DURGAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS S/O LATE MUNIMARAPPA NO.53/1A, HARIHARA ROAD VASANTHPURA BENGALURU – 560 061. …PETITIONER (BY SRI VINAYA KEERTHY M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU CITY BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU CITY BENGALURU – 560 001. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER SUBRAMANYA PURA POLICE STATION BENGALURU – 560 001. 4. SRIVATSA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE SRINIVASAMURTHY Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9245 WP No. 2563 of 2023 5. VEDANTH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O SRIVATSA BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 2ND CROSS, NEAR LAKSHMI TEMPLE ADJACENT TO DESAI GARDEN VASANTHA VALLABHANAGAR BENGALURU – 560 061. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MOHAMMED JAFFAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 31.12.2022 ANNEXURE-D. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation dated 31.12.2022 submitted by the petitioner, seeking to register a FIR. 2. Learned Additional Government Advocate on instructions and verification of records submits that the representation of the petitioner is considered and a crime is - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9245 WP No. 2563 of 2023 registered in Crime No.4/2023. Therefore, nothing further survives for consideration and the petition is rendered as infructuous. 3. In the light of the submissions of the learned Additional Government Advocate, the grievance of the petitioner no longer survives and the petition is disposed as having become infructuous. SD/- JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA NVJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 67