Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15482 (PNJ)

NISHAN PREET ATTRI AND ANR v. SH. ALOK SHEKHAR AND ORS

COCP/347/2025 · 2025-02-07

Harkesh Manuja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

191 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA NISHAN PREET ATTRI AND ANR SH. ALOK SHEKHAR AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, Mr. Athar Ahmed, D HARKESH MANUJA Learned State departmental inquiry initiated against respondent No.5 in the main writ petition shall be concluded within 4 weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid learned counsel for the petit does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner be at liberty to seek revival eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listin 07.02.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: NISHAN PREET ATTRI AND ANR Versus SH. ALOK SHEKHAR AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, Advocate for the Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel on instructions informs that the departmental inquiry initiated against respondent No.5 in the main writ petition shall be concluded within 4 weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid learned counsel for the petit does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner be at liberty to seek revival of the conte eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-347-2025 Date of Decision: February 07, 2025 ........Petitioners .......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate and Advocate for the petitioners. AG, Punjab. counsel on instructions informs that the departmental inquiry initiated against respondent No.5 in the main writ petition shall be concluded within 4 weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid learned counsel for the petitioners in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioners would of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. g of revival application. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2025 February 07, 2025 counsel on instructions informs that the departmental inquiry initiated against respondent No.5 in the main writ ioners in case the needful is not done within the would and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.10 14:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document