NISHAN PREET ATTRI AND ANR v. SH. ALOK SHEKHAR AND ORS
COCP/347/2025 · 2025-02-07
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15482 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15482 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
191
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA NISHAN PREET ATTRI AND ANR
SH. ALOK SHEKHAR AND ORS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present: Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate and
Mr. Sukhbeer Singh,
Mr. Athar Ahmed, D HARKESH MANUJA
Learned State departmental inquiry initiated against respondent No.5 in the main writ petition shall be concluded within 4 weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid learned counsel for the petit does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner be at liberty to seek revival eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/ favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listin
07.02.2025 Tejwinder
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:
NISHAN PREET ATTRI AND ANR
Versus SH. ALOK SHEKHAR AND ORS
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sukhbeer Singh, Advocate for the Mr. Athar Ahmed, DAG, Punjab. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)
Learned State counsel on instructions informs that the departmental inquiry initiated against respondent No.5 in the main writ petition shall be concluded within 4 weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid learned counsel for the petit does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner be at liberty to seek revival of the conte eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay additional sum of Rs.50,000/- as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-347-2025 Date of Decision: February 07, 2025
........Petitioners
.......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Manbir Singh, Advocate and Advocate for the petitioners. AG, Punjab. counsel on instructions informs that the departmental inquiry initiated against respondent No.5 in the main writ petition shall be concluded within 4 weeks from today.
In view of the aforesaid learned counsel for the petitioners in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioners would of the contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e. g of revival application. (HARKESH MANUJA)
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Yes/No 2025 February 07, 2025
counsel on instructions informs that the departmental inquiry initiated against respondent No.5 in the main writ ioners in case the needful is not done within the would and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned Officer would be liable to pay as costs from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioners towards litigation expenses, immediately, i.e.
TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.02.10 14:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document