Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154808 (ALL)

SAVITRI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. KRIASHI SHIKSHA EVAM ANUSANDHAN VIBHAG LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/8434/2025 · 2025-07-30

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43942 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8434 of 2025 Petitioner :- Savitri Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Kriashi Shiksha Evam Anusandhan Vibhag Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Chandra Tewari,Yogendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 & 5 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner's husband namely Sri Ram Bahore was working as Cook and had been confirmed under the respondent-University on 13.12.1992 and subsequently died in harness on 14.11.2021. Subsequent thereto, the petitioner's son has been given compassionate appointment yet the respondents have failed to pay the death gratuity, leave encashment as well as other death benefits including family pension to the petitioner and hence the petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 & 5 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 to 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 30.7.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench