DR.SHRAVAN KUMAR VISHNOI, AUTH. REP. OF FINANCIAL CREDITORS OF M/S ANDES TOWN PLANNERS PVT. LTD. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND 7 OTHERS
WRIC/7373/2025 · 2025-08-11
Manish Kumar, Sangeeta Chandra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154805 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46662-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7373 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr.Shravan Kumar Vishnoi, Auth. Rep. Of Financial Creditors Of M/S Andes Town Planners Pvt. Ltd. Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Kumar,Hemant Tiwari,Sarvesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Aprajita Bansal,Ratnesh Chandra,Shobhit Mohan Shukla Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard Sri Sarvesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms. Aprajita Bansal,
learned counsel representing the respondent no.7, Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel representing the respondent no.3, Sri Shobhit Mohan Shukla,
learned counsel representing the respondent no.5, Mr. Bhanu Bajpayee, learned counsel representing the respondent no.6 and learned Standing Counsel representing the State Respondents.
2. This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:-
"Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 08.07.2025 passed by Respondent No. 3 (Lucknow Development Authority), whereby material changes to the project land including alterations in land use, Floor Area Ratio (FAR), and the nature and character of the "Ananta Tower" project have been regularized by way of compounding. (contained as Annexure No.1) Issue a writ, order, or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned sanctioned building plan (MAP) and layout dated 07.12.2021, along with all consequential and incidental proceedings thereto, after calling for and examining the records pertaining to the same."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and the same may be
dismissed as such with liberty to file a fresh.
4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition on behalf of home buyers.
Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Rahul Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAHUL TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench