Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154779 (ALL)

KESHAV PRASAD TIWARI @ KESHAV PRASAD v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, AYODHYA REGION, AYODHYA AND 6 OTHERS

/4561/2025 · 2025-08-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45128 Court No. - 5 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4561 of 2025 Petitioner :- Keshav Prasad Tiwari @ Keshav Prasad Respondent :- Additional Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankit Dubey,Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondent is hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for a direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the Appeal No. 2568/2023 having Computerized Case No. T 202204230303152 filed U/S 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code (Girija Shankar Vs. Keshav Prasad), expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1-Additional Commissioner, Administration, Ayodhya Region, Ayodhya is directed to decide the Appeal No. 2568/2023 having Computerized Case No. T 202204230303152 filed U/S 24(4) of U.P. Revenue Code (Girija Shankar Vs. Keshav Prasad), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 4.8.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench